Based on the latest publicly available numbers, a reasonable fundamental fair‑value band for Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL) is around ₹130–₹150 per share, with a central value near ₹140, assuming no sharp downcycle in steel prices or major policy shock.

Below is the rationale.

---

1. Where SAIL is trading and core valuation metrics

Recent data (Jan–Feb 2026):

- Price: ~₹150–155 (₹151.05 on BSE as of 30 Jan 2026; ₹154.36 on NSE as of 3 Feb 2026). (stockanalysis.com)

- TTM EPS (consolidated): ~₹6.2 per share. (business-standard.com)

- Trailing P/E: ~22–23x. (stockanalysis.com)

- Book value per share (consolidated): ~₹141. ■ P/B currently ~1.0–1.1x. (business-standard.com)

- FY25 consolidated net profit: ~₹2,372 crore. (economictimes.indiatimes.com)

- Shares outstanding: ~4,136 million (~413.6 crore). (companiesmarketcap.com)

- Implied FY25 EPS ≈ ₹2,372 crore / 413.6 crore ≈ ₹5.7 – consistent with TTM EPS ~₹6.2.

- EV and EBITDA:

- Enterprise value: ~₹94,000 crore. (stockanalysis.com)

- FY25 standalone EBITDA: ~₹11,764 crore. (sail.co.in)

- Implied EV / EBITDA ≈ 8x, which is on the richer side for PSU cyclic steel.

So, at current levels the stock is:

- Cheap on P/B (near book),

- Not cheap on P/E (low‑20s) for a cyclical PSU,

- Slightly rich on EV/EBITDA (~8x) versus what you’d typically assign to a PSU steel company in mid‑cycle (6–7x).

---

2. Fair value from an EV/EBITDA perspective (primary anchor)

For a cyclical, asset‑heavy PSU like SAIL, EV/EBITDA and P/B are usually more reliable than P/E, because earnings swing dramatically across the cycle.

Step 1 – Normalised EBITDA

- FY25 EBITDA: ~₹11,764 crore (standalone). (sail.co.in)

- H1 FY26 shows modest improvement in EBITDA and debt reduction, suggesting a slightly better run‑rate but still broadly mid‑cycle. (in.investing.com)

For valuation purposes, taking a normalised EBITDA of ~₹12,000 crore is reasonable.

Step 2 – Assign a fair EV/EBITDA multiple

- Integrated Indian steel players (Tata Steel, JSW) often trade in the 7–9x EV/EBITDA band in good times, but:

- SAIL has PSU overhang,

- Lower structural ROE (FY25 consolidated ROE around low‑ to mid‑single digits), (tipranks.com)

- Higher sensitivity to domestic policy / pricing and imports. (sail.co.in)

So a fair mid‑cycle multiple for SAIL is more conservative, around 6.5–7.0x EV/EBITDA.

Step 3 – Implied equity value and per‑share price

- Assume normalised EBITDA ≈ ₹12,000 crore.

- Fair EV at 6.5–7.0x:

- At 6.5x: EV ≈ 6.5 × 12,000 = ₹78,000 crore

- At 7.0x: EV ≈ 7.0 × 12,000 = ₹84,000 crore

- Debt (borrowings) has been reduced from ~₹29,800 crore to ~₹26,400 crore by Sep 2025. (in.investing.com)

Use net debt ≈ ₹26,000 crore as a working number.

- Fair equity value (EV – net debt) becomes:

- Low end: 78,000 – 26,000 ≈ ₹52,000 crore

- High end: 84,000 – 26,000 ≈ ₹58,000 crore

- With ~413.6 crore shares outstanding: (companiesmarketcap.com)

- Low end fair value per share: 52,000 / 413.6 ≈ ₹125–₹130

- High end fair value per share: 58,000 / 413.6 ≈ ₹140

EV/EBITDA lens therefore supports a fair‑value zone of roughly ₹130–₹140 per share.

---

3. Cross‑check using Price‑to‑Book

From Business Standard data (late 2025):

- Book value per share (BVPS): ~₹141.

- At that time, P/B ≈ 0.94x; at ~₹150 now, P/B ≈ 1.05–1.1x. (business-standard.com)

For PSU cyclicals like SAIL:

- Historically, they have traded mostly in the 0.6–1.2x book band across the cycle, clustering around 0.8–1.0x in “normal” phases. (This is a general market observation across cycles.)

If we assume:

- Mid‑cycle fair P/B for SAIL ≈ 0.9–1.0x,

- Current and near‑term forward BVPS ≈ ₹140–₹150 (assuming some profit retention, modest growth, and ongoing deleveraging),

Then:

- Lower end fair value ≈ 0.9 × 140 ≈ ₹125–₹130

- Upper end ≈ 1.0 × 150 ≈ ₹150

P/B cross‑check also gives a fair‑value corridor of roughly ₹130–₹150, with the stock currently trading near the top of that band.

---

4. Why this fair‑value band makes sense – key drivers

Positives already being priced in:

1. Stable to improving operating performance

- FY25 EBITDA remained strong (~₹11,764 crore) despite pressure from steel prices and imports. (sail.co.in)

- H1 FY26 shows EBITDA growth and margin resilience along with operational efficiency gains (coke rate, energy use). (in.investing.com)

2. Debt reduction

- Borrowings reduced by ~₹3,400 crore in just six months of FY26, improving the debt‑equity ratio towards 0.4–0.5x. (in.investing.com)

- This supports a small valuation premium versus earlier periods when leverage was higher.

3. Domestic infra and capex cycle

- Government capex focus and infra push remain strong, structurally supporting domestic steel demand, which benefits SAIL as a PSU steel major. (sail.co.in)

4. Dividend support

- FY25 final dividend of ₹1.60 per share (on face value ₹10) provides some yield floor, though not very high. (sail.co.in)

Risks and constraints that cap fair value:

1. Cyclicality of earnings

- FY25 consolidated profit fell ~23% YoY to ~₹2,372 crore despite a strong Q4, illustrating how quickly earnings can compress. (economictimes.indiatimes.com)

- This makes paying high‑teens to low‑20s P/E for a PSU steel company more risky, hence the reliance on EV/EBITDA and P/B anchors.

2. PSU discount and governance overhang

- As a government‑controlled entity, SAIL typically trades at a discount to private‑sector peers on P/E and P/B due to capital allocation concerns, policy risk, and potential for non‑economic decisions.

3. Import pressure and global price risk

- Management itself has highlighted cheap imports and soft prices as key headwinds affecting margins and profitability. (sail.co.in)

- Any downcycle in steel prices can quickly drive EBITDA and EPS below current levels, justifying conservative multiples (6.5–7x EV/EBITDA and ~1x book at best).

4. High capex requirements

- Expansion, modernisation, and decarbonisation plans require sustained capex, which can keep ROE moderate and limit valuation re‑rating despite cyclical tailwinds. (in.investing.com)

Given this mix of:

- Decent asset base and improved balance sheet, but

- Cyclical earnings, PSU discount, and ongoing policy/import risk,

a mid‑cycle fair value near book (0.9–1.0x BV) and ~6.5–7x mid‑cycle EBITDA is consistent. This directly translates to roughly ₹130–₹150, with a central, more “neutral” point around ₹140.

---

5. How to interpret this practically (illustrative, not advice)

- At or below ~₹130:

- The stock would be at ≤0.9x book and ≤6x EV/EBITDA (normalised), indicating a more attractive risk‑reward if you are comfortable with steel cyclicality and PSU risk.

- Around ₹140:

- Valuation is broadly in line with conservative fair value estimates based on current fundamentals and mid‑cycle assumptions.

- Above ~₹150–160:

- The market is effectively pricing in stronger‑than‑mid‑cycle margins and/or a re‑rating (perhaps on the back of a very strong steel upcycle, faster deleveraging, or structural ROE improvement). Upside then depends more on the cycle staying very favourable.

This entire band and discussion is illustrative and based on current public data and standard valuation practices for cyclical PSUs; it is not a buy/sell/hold recommendation.

---

If you have any further queries, please connect with us on 022-6290-10141 (Timings : 09.00 AM to 05.00 PM) or you can email us on info@cniinfoxchange.com