From a 1‑year, tactical point of view (not long‑term core allocation), the relatively better‑placed sectors in India right now are:

---

1. Banking – especially PSU + large private banks

Why it looks relatively favourable for 1 year

- Credit growth in the system remains healthy; NPAs are structurally lower than the last cycle.

- Valuations of many banks remain reasonable vs. broader market after underperforming for parts of 2025.

- Multiple brokerages are overweight banks for the coming couple of years, expecting them to drive a good part of Nifty earnings. (reuters.com)

Illustrative ETFs (not recommendations)

- SBI Nifty Bank ETF – tracks Nifty Bank; 1‑year trailing return ~11.4% as of 8 Dec 2025. (moneycontrol.com)

- ICICI Prudential Nifty Bank ETF / Index Fund – also tracks Nifty Bank; 1‑year trailing return ~12–12.5% as of early Dec 2025. (etmoney.com)

- ICICI Prudential Nifty PSU Bank ETF / DSP Nifty PSU Bank ETF – focused on PSU banks; 1‑year returns ~18% as of 5 Dec 2025. (economictimes.indiatimes.com)

How to think about it (example approach)

For a 1‑year tactical bet, banking/PSU‑bank ETFs can be used as a satellite exposure around a diversified Nifty 50/Nifty 500 core, given the earnings tailwind and still‑moderate valuations.

---

2. Autos & Auto Ancillaries

Why it looks relatively favourable

- Demand is supported by income growth, replacement demand and premiumisation (SUVs, high‑end bikes).

- Government focus on infra and rural income is supportive for CVs and tractors over a 1–2 year view.

- Broking houses are generally positive on autos as a key cyclical beneficiary over the next earnings cycle. (reuters.com)

Illustrative ETF

- ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto ETF – tracks Nifty Auto; 1‑year return ~19.3% as of late Nov/early Dec 2025, with strong 3‑year CAGR as well. (economictimes.indiatimes.com)

How to think about it (example approach)

This is more cyclical than banks. For a 1‑year view, it suits investors comfortable with volatility and sector concentration, ideally with staggered entry rather than lump‑sum.

---

3. PSU / Infra‑linked plays (via PSU‑heavy ETFs)

While not a pure “sector” in the SEBI sense, PSU‑heavy ETFs (CPSE/PSU bank etc.) are effectively leveraged to:

- Government capex, railways, defence, power & energy.

- Ongoing PSU re‑rating and higher dividend yields.

Examples include CPSE/PSU‑focused ETFs and PSU Bank ETFs, which have meaningfully outperformed Nifty 50 in the last 1–2 years, though with high volatility (e.g., PSU Bank ETFs ~18%+ 1‑year return vs ~6% for Nifty 50 as of early Dec 2025). (moneycontrol.com)

These are higher‑risk, higher‑beta tactical bets; position sizing needs to be conservative.

---

4. Sectors that look more “contrarian” than “clear 1‑year bets”

These may or may not work over just 1 year, but are worth understanding:

a) IT

- Nifty IT has materially underperformed in the last year; Nifty IT ETFs (Kotak, Mirae, etc.) show ~‑11.5% 1‑year returns as of 5 Dec 2025. (moneycontrol.com)

- Some houses still stay underweight IT vs. other sectors for the near term, but there is valuation support for a 2–3 year view. (reuters.com)

So, IT ETFs look more like a mean‑reversion/3‑year idea rather than a clear 1‑year sectoral call.

b) Pharma, FMCG, Staples

- Generally seen as defensive and have lagged cyclicals; some brokerages are underweight consumer staples and cautious on pharma for now. (reuters.com)

- They can protect in downturns but may not lead in a “risk‑on, earnings‑recovery” phase over just 12 months.

---

Practical usage guidelines for sectoral ETFs (for a 1‑year view)

These are general examples, not personal advice:

1. Core vs satellite

- Keep the core in broad market ETFs/indices (Nifty 50, Nifty Next 50, Nifty 500).

- Use sectoral ETFs (Banking, PSU Banks, Auto, PSU/CPSE) as satellite positions only.

2. Position sizing

- For many investors, limiting each sectoral exposure to, say, 5–10% of total equity (per sector) is more prudent, given the concentration risk.

3. Entry strategy

- For a 1‑year horizon, consider staggered entry (SIP/STP over 2–3 months) instead of a large lump‑sum to manage near‑term volatility.

4. Exit & review

- Pre‑define your review point (~12 months) and check:

- Has the sector rerated sharply vs. earnings?

- Is the original thesis (credit growth, auto demand, PSU re‑rating) still intact?

- Sectoral ETFs should be actively reviewed; they are not “buy and forget”.

---

Important caveats

- I do not have live tick‑by‑tick data; all return numbers above are based on last available NAVs around 1–8 December 2025 from public sources and are illustrative only, not guarantees.

- Past performance does not guarantee future returns.

- Sectoral ETFs are highly concentrated and more volatile than diversified index funds.

- The above is not personalised investment advice. Actual suitability depends on your risk profile, asset allocation, and time horizon.

---

If you have any further queries, please connect with us on 022-6290-10141 (Timings : 09.00 AM to 05.00 PM) or you can email us on info@cniinfoxchange.com